[Linux-aus] SCO, hypocrisy & web sites..

[Greg 'groggy' Lehey]

On Sunday, 24 August 2003 at 22:26:39 +1000, Chris Samuel wrote:
>
> Oh what a suprise..
>
> http://csamuel.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=17&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0&POSTNUKESID=6a98624d069f3ffa98ed3745f15e1d92

You miss a very forceful point here: how did SCO come to quote
BSD-licensed source code and claim it was their own?  The original
file contained a big BSD license.  If they have removed it, they're in
breach of the license.  If they haven't, how come they didn't see it?
See http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/code-comparison.html#BPF for more
details.

Greg
--
Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20030825/93bccb86/attachment-0001.pgp