[Computerbank] recent emails

[David Lloyd]

Patrician,

> I was kind of thinking of the "others" as part of "we". (maybe I'm 
> reading you wrong here...?)

Yes, they are part of "we". My question, though, to myself is:

 Do I want to stand on a burning bridge and fall with it?

> > In times like this a complete change of committee and faces can
> > occur, but there are too many entrenched positions to do that.
> 
> That sounds like the divorce. That's not necessarily a Bad Thing, any 
> more than staying together (working for betterment or otherwise) is a 
> Good Thing by definition. I guess I'd like to see whether there's a 
> consensus...

The problems that ComputerBank are facing are not insurmountable. But
the guard is fracturing and the fighting has already begun...

> That's only one viewpoint from a whole raft of possible viewpoints.
> I'd be glad to know what the others are. My own feelings aren't as 
> lacerated as many people's, because I've kept me distance for quite a 
> while; that's helped. 

It does help; I've kept myself busy with other organisations but when I
came back to ComputerBank it seems nothing has changed. Something has to
change or a change will be forced upon us...

> The people who seem to be at the centre of the maelstrom are *all* 
> (without *any* exceptions) in my view hugely talented, valuable, great
> people. It would just be great if they could feel talented, valuable 
> and treasured in this company, differences notwithstanding!

I would tend to agree but I quote from the same song:


Pas the point of no return, no point resiting
Our passion play has now at last begun!


..but what type of passion play? I fear this is of the Easter Passion
and someone is trying to decide who is Christ...


DSL