[Computerbank] jennifairy's post re SA woes

[Kylie Davies]

Hi again,

Because other emails to you have addressed this issue re the existence 
of BOTH models and the options available to you at the time the national 
incorporation was being completed I can only say that I am sorry that 
you feel this way.

> had the impetus to do so. We here have waited SO LONG for the 
> Aust-wide incorporation, thinking that we couldn't really

Yes - it was a long time and this was unexpected - it took away from the 
Victorian activities too as National incorporation took up much more 
time then it needed too.  Everyone was frustrated with it. :(

> do much here until that was acheived. Maybe that was wrong, but it 
> seemed to be the thing to do at the time. It feels like we've been 
> sitting on our hands while 'someone/s' ( please dont think I dont 
> appreciate your time & effort) organised the paperwork side of things 
> so that we would all be better off. 


If you were sitting on your hands while we were doing the national 
incorporation process - that is a shame and I can't understand why  - 
because while this was happening you could have (or were perhaps)  been 
doing "computerbank stuff" like talking to likely sponsors and 
affiliates, getting support locally and through other means using your 
identity and our numbers/policies as we suggested throughout by becoming 
members of our vic group (before incorp).

Can you tell me how things might be different for you if you were 
incorporated in your own right, and how things might be different if you 
started this process a year ago?

Your point is taken and it will be contributed to the discussion.

Cheers,

Kylie