<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>RE: [LC++]template and gcc</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> gcc-2.7.2 to generate the required object code (the "template class </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Running<int>;" approach wasn't reliable with that compiler). I also </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Oh, sorry. I didn't know that.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Do you know if it's because of a bug in this version, or because</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>this method is undefined behavior ?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> way, particularly with the adoption of the STL. Presumably </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> linkers have got </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> a lot smarter in adopting techniques to avoid duplicate code.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>That's the export keyword, and it's a bitch to get working</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>properly. But it's in the standard :) So one day, we'll maybe</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>have it working in our compilers...</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-- </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Vincent Penquerc'h </FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>