[LC++]static const char*

[Roberto Diaz]

> > optimizations perfomed on integer constants?), and the correct way
> > should be:
> It's not because of optimization - AFAIR the c++ standard allows for
> in-class static const member initialization as far as they are of an
> integral type. IMO this is why the example works with int and doesn't 
> work with char*.

Ok.. anyway I see it is dangerous to define static const members that you want
to initialize in order to have something similar to C-style #define..

I am using namespaces.. no problems there... or am I wrong too?



-- 
Saludos

Roberto Díaz <roberto at vivaldi.dhis.org>

PLEASE HELP SAVE faqs.org!
http://www.faqs.org/save_faqs-org.html