<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/7/26 15:40, Marcus Herstik via
linux-aus wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:SY2PPFC0D96257C114DADE4086D2F9AE504D4C52@SY2PPFC0D96257C.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr"
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Support can come in many ways - not just financial. </div>
<div dir="ltr"
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
This leads to the obvious question - why don't we start
litigating these kind of things as an organisation ?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm finding this position puzzling, Marcus, in relation to your
comment:</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:SY2PPFC0D96257C114DADE4086D2F9AE504D4C52@SY2PPFC0D96257C.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM">
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-body-separator-line"
data-applydefaultfontstyles="true"
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"
dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div dir="ltr"
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
I'm sorry but that's a no from me. </div>
<div dir="ltr"
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
We are not here to fund litigation. </div>
<div dir="ltr"
style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
While we may receive the benefit of the result of that
litigation it was not started by us nor is LA a party to
this. </div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>The problem I see with any idea that Linux Australia would 'start
litigating these kinds of [legal battles]' is in choosing what,
and how, and in getting legal advice. We'd have to get community
feedback on which issues LA chose to tackle, and then maybe ask
the community again when things got stymied (as they inevitably do
when fighting legal battles with large government departments).
And then the LA council would have to put their names to court
filings and proceedings. Linux Australia retains no lawyers.</p>
<p>It's much better, IMO, for individual members to do what Fraser
has done here (take on the fight because of a personal commitment)
and then ask for Linux Australia's assistance. Fraser has openly
asked for community funding for his legal proceedings as well, so
this is not just a matter that Linux Australia is being asked to
assist alone.</p>
<p>I am fully in support of Linux Australia giving financial
assistance to Fraser's work to ask for the source code of software
made by a government department for deployment on Australian
citizens' phones to be made publicly available.</p>
<p>The government makes many things available under Creative Commons
licenses (thanks to Pia Andrews for pushing for this!).</p>
<p>Hope this helps,</p>
<p>Paul</p>
</body>
</html>