<div dir="ltr">Perhaps take the Chaos Communication Congress approach by providing (translated) versions of this T-Shirt:<div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.foebud.org/rfid/fotoalbum/t-shirts-kappus-keine-bilder/Shirt%20KEINE%20BILDER%20David%20(4).JPG/view">https://www.foebud.org/rfid/fotoalbum/t-shirts-kappus-keine-bilder/Shirt%20KEINE%20BILDER%20David%20(4).JPG/view</a><br>
</div><div><br></div><div>Translation: "No Photos! I hereby disagree with the recording, storage, transmission and other uses of my image".</div><div><br></div><div>pix</div><div><br></div><div>PS: Wow, it was hard to find a picture of that shirt ;)</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 21 January 2014 10:49, Noel Butler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:noel.butler@ausics.net" target="_blank">noel.butler@ausics.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div><div class="im">
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 08:54 +1030, Michael Davies wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<pre>
If you're in a public space you can be legally photographed without
your permission. That's the law of the land. But as a community,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
That wont wash with LCA<br>
Any first year law student could argue that LCA is a "private event" held in a "private venue" <br>
<br>
Of course if LCA was held on public property, like a park, sidewalk, or even after such event in a car park, there's no argument.<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
linux-aus mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>