<div dir="ltr">I'm a member of another general-membership organisation. It has the policy of staying completely clear of politics, organisationally speaking. There is robust member debate, but nothing done officially. Does or should LA have an organisational role in policy review or political commentary?</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Harry McNally <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:harrymc@decisions-and-designs.com.au" target="_blank">harrymc@decisions-and-designs.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 27/11/13 16:19, Tennessee Leeuwenburg wrote:<br>
<br>
> I have absolutely no idea whether there should be a "Technology party" or a<br>
> "Science and technology party" but I think it's an interesting idea. And we<br>
> need to bring back someone to keep the bastards honest*.<br>
<br>
A Senate (re)election in WA is likely in March ..<br>
<br>
<a href="http://journalisnt.net/?p=306" target="_blank">http://journalisnt.net/?p=306</a><br>
<br>
Harry<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
linux-aus mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>--------------------------------------------------<br>Tennessee Leeuwenburg<br><a href="http://myownhat.blogspot.com/">http://myownhat.blogspot.com/</a><br>"Don't believe everything you think"
</div>