<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><body>
<p>Hi Euan et al,</p>
<p>Two further points on this - IMHO, the video team should be separated from the LCA conf organisers as much as possible - any human cost should not spill out to impact the conf organisers. if something has to not happen because of lack of person-power in the video team, then so be it - no impact on the conf. Swim-laning/containment.</p>
<p>Also, Tim's streaming interface had a really neat feature - the ability to either block the stream from a set of IPs (such as the conference delegate networks), or only offer low bandwidth streams to a set of IPs. This discourages the "sitting in a room watching another presentation behaviour somewhat. Of course you cant catch every 3G or VPN connected client, but its about the majority/path of least resistance...</p>
<p> James</p>
<p>On 2013-03-25 23:21, Euan de Kock wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">
<pre>There will always be an element of effort involved in doing
this - every aspect of LCA (or any conference) has a human cost - it's
just how we budget our team based on what we are trying to deliver
during the conference.
<br /><br />
We'd probably need to instill some basic codes of conduct to discourage
people from sitting in a presentation watching other talks via streaming
on their laptop, but this is part of a process of experimenting and
finding the right balance.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
</body></html>