Hi,<div><br>On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Matthew Lye wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Wasn't this done a year ago?</blockquote><div><br></div>
<div>The last reference I can find on the LA site is from council meeting minutes dated 15/2/12:</div><div dir="ltr">"</div><span class="Apple-style-span" style><ul style="list-style-type:circle;padding-top:5px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px">
<li style="list-style-type:circle;padding-top:5px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:1.5em"><p style="margin-top:10px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:10px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px">
Secure Boot seems to have quietened down. Pursue?<br>Postponed.</p><p style="margin-top:10px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:10px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px"><br></p>
<span></span></li></ul></span><div>A lot has happened tween times.</div><div>Just wondering if a public statement was made or any further work done on the matter? </div><div> Rgds</div><div>BW</div><div><br></div><div><br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><br><br> Leadership is responsibility, not privilege, Action, not position, Guidance, not knowledge, and outcome, not disposition.<br>
<No trees were harmed during this transmission. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Brent Wallis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'brent.wallis@gmail.com');" target="_blank">brent.wallis@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi to All,<div><br></div><div>What is our collective response to UEFI and secure boot?</div><div><br></div><div>Canonical and RH have taken a position.</div><div>The FSF seem to have taken an opposing view.</div><div><br>
</div>
<div>Is it true?</div><div>Could we be facing a situation where we could be locked out of a Linux install on current and future PC/ Laptop hardware?</div><div><br></div><div>What impact will this have on servers systems?</div>
<div>Rgds</div><span><font color="#888888"><div>BW</div>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
linux-aus mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au');" target="_blank">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote><div> </div><div><br></div><div> </div><div> </div></div>