<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 11:03 +1000, Anestis Kozakis wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
On 20 July 2012 10:23, Michael Davies <<A HREF="mailto:michael@the-davies.net">michael@the-davies.net</A>> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Gary Allpike <<A HREF="mailto:gary@allpikes.com.au">gary@allpikes.com.au</A>> wrote:
>> It appears to me there is another agenda here, but no one will actually come
>> out and say what it is.
>
> <A HREF="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/25/tinfoil_db52b2f10e7fa983f0f9d799a20.jpg">http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/25/tinfoil_db52b2f10e7fa983f0f9d799a20.jpg</A>
Yup, exactly. It seems some people can't understand a simple premise
- that Linux Australia needs to change their name.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Then why are they so vicious about NOT relinquishing the LA name when/if they change it?<BR>
<BR>
There are enough lame ass squatters in this world as it is.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>