I would also consider this to be a good idea because of the way that we tend to adopt UK policy.<div><br></div><div>Even discounting this look at ITIL and Prince2 for examples of how UK Govt policies and reference materials have a way of making a large impact.<div>
<br></div><div>-Matthew Lye<br><br> Leadership is responsibility, not privilege, Action, not position, Guidance, not knowledge, and outcome, not disposition.<br><No trees were harmed during this transmission. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Noel Butler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:noel.butler@ausics.net" target="_blank">noel.butler@ausics.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<u></u>
<div><div class="im">
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 10:36 +1000, Brendan Scott wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<pre>Unfortunately, Australian Governments tend not to want to be the first at doing anything, particularly in this area. If you ever go to a parliamentary inquiry they will always ask you what the rest of the world has done. It is somewhat frustrating when, for example you've established "A implies B and A" they won't accept " therefore B" unless some other government has, but that just seems to be the way it is.
</pre>
</blockquote></div>
Aint that the truth.<br>
<br>
<br>
I think this is a good idea and should be supported.
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
linux-aus mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>