<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div>If you're using the traditional tape scanner algorithm, Amanda will simply use whatever it happens to think is best.<div><br></div><div>You may have to do what you say but I notice in:</div><div><br></div><div> <a href="http://wiki.zmanda.com/man/amanda-taperscan.7.html">http://wiki.zmanda.com/man/amanda-taperscan.7.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>Or man amanda-taperscan (man 7 amanda-taperscan) on a machine it's installed shows how to force it to use a more 'lexical' ordering. Note it says LEXICAL not numeric, so you may get 1, 10, 11, 2, 3, 4 :)</div><div><br></div><div>DSL</div><div><br></div><div><div><div>On 14/09/2011, at 5:52 AM, rwolfe wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><p>Hi all!</p><p>Maybe this is the wrong place to post this question, but I have tried everything I can think of to rectify this situation.</p><p>Simply put, we have a backup set that has tapes out of order and I would like to get the tapes in in sequential order without having to delete the tapes from the set, waiting for a backup cycle and then readding the tapes back in again. If there is an easier way to do this, I would be much appreciated to know it :)</p><p>Thanks!</p><p>Robert</p>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>linux-aus mailing list<br><a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>