And me as well.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Russell Coker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:russell@coker.com.au">russell@coker.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, <a href="mailto:david@davidnewall.com">david@davidnewall.com</a> wrote:<br>
</div>> Russell Coker:<br>
<div class="im">> > Silvia's interpretation of your email was almost identical to mine.<br>
> > When your email is consistently interpreted in a way that differs from<br>
> > your intent then you should consider whether it's your writing ability<br>
> > that's lacking not other people's ability to interpret it.<br>
><br>
</div>> With hundreds of people reading this list, I don't believe two failures in<br>
> communication represents a consistent problem. In one of those cases the<br>
> correspondant repeatedly drew the same incorrect meaning despite my<br>
> various attempts to correct the misunderstanding. That looks very much<br>
> like willfulness rather than mistake.<br>
<br>
You can also add Donna and Andrew Pam to the list.<br>
<br>
Your inability to see any evidence of women being mistreated in the IT<br>
industry is starting to seem more like willfulness than a mistake.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">My Main Blog <a href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/" target="_blank">http://etbe.coker.com.au/</a><br>
My Documents Blog <a href="http://doc.coker.com.au/" target="_blank">http://doc.coker.com.au/</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
linux-aus mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>