<p>Most of the discussion is not forward thinking on improving transparency and the decision process but on debating women in FOSS and if LA should support this effort.</p>
<p>I agree on a healthy discussion intended to result in process or policy improvement but not members of the community arguing over research and opinion in what is degenerating into a borderline abusive manner. </p>
<p>This decision is done, focus on the future and recomend changes that will improve things instead of if the donation should have been made. That is a constructive endevour.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 24 Feb 2011 21:30, "Peter Lieverdink" <<a href="mailto:peter@cc.com.au">peter@cc.com.au</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> ----- Original Message -----<br>>> I concur, but I think that our opinions are moot.<br>
> <br>> I disagree.<br>> <br>>> Part of the role of<br>>> the LAC is to make these decisions. Support their decision or stand<br>>> for a position next time. We have too many armchair generals that<br>
>> don't want to do any more than complain about decisions the counsel<br>>> has already made.<br>> <br>> In this case, perhaps. But a discussion will certainly affect future decisions, so in that respect it's certainly not moot.<br>
> <br>> Cheers,<br>> - Peter.<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> linux-aus mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br></div>