I would hate to imagine LA trying to follow a constitution that complicated.<div><br></div><div>I would like to see some clarification on James Polley's query about this.</div><div><br></div><div>By member does the constitution mean anyone... or one of the ordinary members in council. If the Treasurer moves to President, who backfills Treasurer? Can one person actually fill both positions?<br>
<div><br clear="all">-Matthew Lye<br><br>You can do anything you set your mind to when you have vision, determination, and and endless supply of expendable labor.<br><No trees were harmed during this transmission. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:silvia@silvia-pfeiffer.de">silvia@silvia-pfeiffer.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
LA does not have the US constitution as its constitution. :)<br>
<font color="#888888">S.<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:53 AM, David Lloyd <<a href="mailto:lloy0076@adam.com.au">lloy0076@adam.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> In the event that the President of the United States becomes unfit for office, the Vice President becomes Acting President or The President (if the reason is because of death) for the President's term of office.<br>
><br>
> If the Vice President is also incapacitated - think something like the Polish Presidential plane crashing - then the Speak of the House takes the role. If the speaker is incapacitated, the President of the Senate takes the role and failing that there is a succession between the Executive Secretaries.<br>
><br>
> DSL<br>
><br>
> On 06/05/2010, at 10:18 AM, Paul Shirren wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On 6/05/10 3:11 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:<br>
>>> There were three nominations for president at the last election.<br>
>>> Was the person who came second considered?<br>
>><br>
>> If Obama is unable to fulfil his duty you get Biden not McCain. If Rudd<br>
>> can't cope you get Gillard not Howard.<br>
>><br>
>> I guess it comes down to what is in the constitution. I would guess that<br>
>> VP would usually be the replacement. I am sure the committee has read<br>
>> the rules and is constrained by them.<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> linux-aus mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> linux-aus mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
linux-aus mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au">linux-aus@lists.linux.org.au</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus" target="_blank">http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div></div></div>