Hello....<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/6/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">James Purser</b> <<a href="mailto:purserj@k-sit.com">purserj@k-sit.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I'd hazard to say that Microsoft's dominance today can be more<br>attributed to inertia and ignorance that clever marketing. Sure<br>marketing plays a part but as the saying goes "Nobody ever got fired for<br>buying Microsoft".
<br><br></blockquote></div>All valid points....but<br>
If I may, it is worth pointing out some economic realities (for the
sake of cheering up those who are dissapponted with the current state
of play (a state I suffer periodically as well..... :-)) :<br>
<br>
- There is no precedent in human history where a single entity has been
able to monopolise something indefinitely without doing something to
"engineer" the situation in that entities favour.<br>
<br>
- This "engineering" comes at a cost....it could be marketing
related....right down to "dirty" deals done on the side....it could be
restrictive product distribution....or the artificial monopoly that
patents create.......it doesn;t really matter what the nature of the
market engineering takes, all one needs to understand is that it costs
dollars/resources!<br>
<br>
- The cost of this engineering becomes greater when the market involved
is considered "emerging"....a useful metaphor is stretching a rubber
band of fixed length. The more you stretch (eg the more you try and
engineer a monopoly) the more energy it requires to keep the thing
stretched (ie the more you try and prop up a monopoly the more money it
takes to do so.)<br>
<br>
When considering MS and their position in the "emerging" market of
personal computing there is clear evidence that their 95% monopoly is
already "stretched" to it's limit no matter how much money and FUD they
throw at it:<br>
<br>
- Their share price has stagnated for 5 years!<br>
<br>
- Their share price would have been at least 20% lower today if they had not started issuing dividends.<br>
<br>
- They missed an entire cycle of releases for a new desktop offering.<br>
<br>
- The latest critical WMF security issue was first patched by a lone
(albeit extremly knowledgable and skilled ) individual almost a week
before their "machine" could get one out. This in itslf should be
ringing very loud alarms bells on Wall Street... an individual
performed far better than a multi billion dollar business on that
businesses own products! Imagine the incredulity if Holden
recalled a bunch of Fords and fixed a safety issue for them..... this
is not good for MS at all and seems to indicate that their development
and maintenance model is struggling to match the outcomes of the Open
Source model.<br>
<br>
- Their business model is locked into the FAT PC for without that
they would lose another important piece that assists ther
monopoly...lockin. Their business model prevents them from doing things
like creating a live CD version of Windows.....or selling Office for
Linux.... or any numer of other things that Open Source Freedom not
only allows but facilitates and encourages. Lockin comes at a price for
MS as well, it restricts their ability to "change", an important
fundamental if a business is going to survive in the long term.<br>
<br>
The bottom line is that market is stacked up against MS and their
"rubber band" is forever hungry for dollars....they can;t stretch the
rubber band any more because it has a fixed length. Their
ability/capacity to change is hampered by their own business model. All
their dollars are doing is maintaining the status quo.....It can;t
continue without something breaking... nothing is forever. <br>
<br>
Personally, I feel that the release of Vista this year will provide
more opportunity than anyone realises. Vista for MS is critical for
their ongoing monopoly. If it fails in some small way....(like a
security exploit released in the first few months of distribution which
would make the Trusted computing thing a joke) I reckon they will have
real trouble.<br>
<br>
I think the only downside we face is that market forces in this
situation are "slow" and sometimes it looks like nothing is
happening....but for all of you who have worked on and/or used/deployed
Linux in the last 10 years... ponder where we are now when compared to
1995...<br>
<br>
If you don;t feel warm and fuzzy after doing that I would hazzard a guess that you are probably not of this earth... :-)<br>
<br>
I don;t know of any other collaborative and complex human endeavour that as come so far in such a short time!<br>
<br>
<br>
Rgds<br>
BW<br>
<br>
<br>