[Linux-aus] Ceph FS vs Gluster FS

[Neill Cox]

My personal experience is that Ceph is much more reliable than Gluster.

My experience with Ceph is with using it as a storage backend for
OpenStack, so not so much with CephFS as such.  My advice would be to use
rbd rather than CephFS if you can.

I think at this point Ceph is much more widely used and far better
supported.

Cheers,
Neill

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 04:56, Anestis Kozakis via linux-aus <
linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au> wrote:

> I was wondering fi people could summarize  me the difference as well s the
> pros and cons fo GlusterFS vs CephFS inr regards to the following uses:
>
> File Server/System and creating Virtual Machines and Containers.
>
> I will, of course, do my own research, but I am looking to get other
> people's experiences and opinions.
>
> Anestis.
> --
> Anestis Kozakis | kenosti at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to
> linux-aus-unsubscribe at lists.linux.org.au

-- 
Neill Cox
Ingenious Software
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20230606/7346d32d/attachment.html>