From mithro at mithis.com Sun Feb 1 02:05:16 2015 From: mithro at mithis.com (Tim Ansell) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 02:05:16 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] MemberDB is a great short term solution, but we need a broader rethink In-Reply-To: <8761braapc.fsf@flamingspork.com> References: <54B86BDC.4090801@kathyreid.id.au> <8761braapc.fsf@flamingspork.com> Message-ID: Reusing existing FOSS software sounds like a great idea. I think MemberDB has shown LA doesn't really have the current manpower to maintain our own solution (and that manpower is probably better spent on improving other areas anyway). With something like CiviCRM we get a bunch of new useful features without having to dedicate the extra effort to actually writing them. It also has the added benefit that If we added "online preferential voting" to something like CiviCRM, then others can start using our more enlightened form of voting too :) Tim 'mithro' Ansell On 28 January 2015 at 13:41, Stewart Smith wrote: > Kathy Reid writes: > > First of all, many thanks to Mikal for starting this conversation, and > > to those who've volunteered to make MemberDB better. > > > > While this is a great short term solution, I think we should (in > > parallel) discuss and debate a MemberDB replacement, likely something > > like CiviCRM. This is a bit more work and effort, but I think would have > > good long term returns, and address the pressing need for targeted > > member communications. > > The big thing that was never covered by any other system was online > preferential voting. > > -- > Stewart Smith > > _______________________________________________ > linux-aus mailing list > linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mithro at mithis.com Sun Feb 1 02:11:21 2015 From: mithro at mithis.com (Tim Ansell) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 02:11:21 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] MemberDB is a great short term solution, but we need a broader rethink In-Reply-To: <87386vaa7g.fsf@flamingspork.com> References: <54B86BDC.4090801@kathyreid.id.au> <87386vaa7g.fsf@flamingspork.com> Message-ID: As Stewart mentioned, rewriting from scratch takes a lot of extra effort and I don't think LA has the resources for that type of task. There is a lot more to a conference management system then it first seems like. Plus anything which deals with billing gets complicated fast (writing a billing system seems to be a right of passage for become a real "grumpy old programmer" :). If people really do want to replace ZooKeepr (which I'm not sure is *actually* the case) its worth checking out Symposion used by PyCon US and other conferences (http://eldarion.com/symposion/) and contributing to that. The big problem with Symposion is that it has been highly North America focused and hence probably missing things needed by an Australian conference. Tim 'mithro' Ansell On 28 January 2015 at 13:52, Stewart Smith wrote: > Michael Cordover writes: > > On 16 January 2015 at 14:39, Kathy Reid wrote: > >> While this is a great short term solution, I think we should (in > parallel) > >> discuss and debate a MemberDB replacement, likely something like > CiviCRM. > >> This is a bit more work and effort, but I think would have good long > term > >> returns, and address the pressing need for targeted member > communications. > > > > On this, I think it would be useful to do some project scoping - not > > just around membership, but around all of the web-based systems we are > > thining of upgrading. I know there's also been talk of a zookeepr > > upgrade/rewrite. There are also probably other needs we should be > > considering: other LA events, potential lobbying/other LA activities, > > grants, Mailman 3 integration, Hurd compatibility etc etc etc. > > > > The first step here would be wishlisting *everything*, and then > > scoping it down into actual projects, then commencing work. Strategic > > planning, yo. > > The important thing to keep in mind is that this is all volunteer > work. Zookeepr has been by volunteers from 2007 to get to where it is > today. > > It would be a big judgement call to do a rewrite rather than incremental > change - a lot of effort goes into getting all the basics again, > something that occured about 3 times before we used Zookeepr for the > second time. > > -- > Stewart Smith > > _______________________________________________ > linux-aus mailing list > linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mithro at mithis.com Sun Feb 1 02:38:13 2015 From: mithro at mithis.com (Tim Ansell) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 02:38:13 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] MemberDB is a great short term solution, but we need a broader rethink In-Reply-To: References: <54B86BDC.4090801@kathyreid.id.au> <87386vaa7g.fsf@flamingspork.com> Message-ID: Just getting through backlog of emails and discovered that AJ had also suggested two other alternatives to ZooKeepr in another thread (I'm excluding the third non-FOSS option). For completeness, the list of FOSS conference management systems which *might* be alternatives for ZooKeepr are; * http://eldarion.com/symposion/ - used by PyCon US, ApacheCon * https://launchpad.net/summit - used by Canonical, Linaro, DebConf * http://pentabarf.org/Main_Page - (formerly?) used by CCC, FOSDEM, DebConf Before LCA should even consider changing, someone actually needs to do the legwork to find out all of the following; * if the systems have the features needed by LCA (or other LA conferences) and how much effort would be needed to add the missing features, * if the projects are under active development (and how does that development compare to ZooKeepr), * if the projects are in any better state than Zookeepr * are there any experts we can lean on when we need XXX changes 5 minutes before LCA starts, I'm **not** volunteering to do that. Tim 'mithro' Ansell On 1 February 2015 at 02:11, Tim Ansell wrote: > As Stewart mentioned, rewriting from scratch takes a lot of extra effort > and I don't think LA has the resources for that type of task. There is a > lot more to a conference management system then it first seems like. Plus > anything which deals with billing gets complicated fast (writing a billing > system seems to be a right of passage for become a real "grumpy old > programmer" :). > > If people really do want to replace ZooKeepr (which I'm not sure is > *actually* the case) its worth checking out Symposion used by PyCon US and > other conferences (http://eldarion.com/symposion/) and contributing to > that. The big problem with Symposion is that it has been highly North > America focused and hence probably missing things needed by an Australian > conference. > > Tim 'mithro' Ansell > > > On 28 January 2015 at 13:52, Stewart Smith > wrote: > >> Michael Cordover writes: >> > On 16 January 2015 at 14:39, Kathy Reid wrote: >> >> While this is a great short term solution, I think we should (in >> parallel) >> >> discuss and debate a MemberDB replacement, likely something like >> CiviCRM. >> >> This is a bit more work and effort, but I think would have good long >> term >> >> returns, and address the pressing need for targeted member >> communications. >> > >> > On this, I think it would be useful to do some project scoping - not >> > just around membership, but around all of the web-based systems we are >> > thining of upgrading. I know there's also been talk of a zookeepr >> > upgrade/rewrite. There are also probably other needs we should be >> > considering: other LA events, potential lobbying/other LA activities, >> > grants, Mailman 3 integration, Hurd compatibility etc etc etc. >> > >> > The first step here would be wishlisting *everything*, and then >> > scoping it down into actual projects, then commencing work. Strategic >> > planning, yo. >> >> The important thing to keep in mind is that this is all volunteer >> work. Zookeepr has been by volunteers from 2007 to get to where it is >> today. >> >> It would be a big judgement call to do a rewrite rather than incremental >> change - a lot of effort goes into getting all the basics again, >> something that occured about 3 times before we used Zookeepr for the >> second time. >> >> -- >> Stewart Smith >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-aus mailing list >> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au >> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mithro at mithis.com Sun Feb 1 02:55:25 2015 From: mithro at mithis.com (Tim Ansell) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 02:55:25 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] The case for an established product to replace MemberDB In-Reply-To: <54C07B69.1010607@kathyreid.id.au> References: <54C07B69.1010607@kathyreid.id.au> Message-ID: In Josh's president report he mentions in the "Membership platform" section; The Council, thanks to the hard work of Kathy Reid, has put together a list > of requirements of a membership platform and will be looking for volunteers > to help with shifting to a new system. Could the "list of requirements" be shared with the list? (Or could I have a link to them if they have been shared previous and I've missed them.) Thanks! Tim On 22 January 2015 at 15:24, Kathy Reid wrote: > Hi everyone, > > There's been some excellent debate here about the future of MemberDB, and > whether a mature product - possibly CiviCRM, but not necessarily - should > be favoured over a collection of lower level utilities. > I'd like to make the case for an established product. > > Maintability and supportability > > While less mature tools and utilities may do the job - and do the job well > - and even do *exactly* the job we want them to do, they fall down when it > comes to maintenance and supportability. We have a small team of people who > work on ZooKeepr - which is an integral part of running linux.conf.au - > and both getting new people up to speed and willing to commit unpaid time > to maintenance is difficult. We all have day jobs/lives/other commitments. > > If we were to go down the road of a mature product, then the support > ecosystem would be one of the selection criteria. If necessary, we could > buy in the skills to maintain and support the product, and *documentation* > for the product is likely going to also be more comprehensive, lowering the > barrier to entry of those who may wish to volunteer time to maintain it. > > > Alignment with values > > Linux Australia supports open communities and open technologies, and > contributes to the open source industry and ecosystem in Australia and New > Zealand. I feel that it's actually a closer alignment to our values to > support and adopt an existing mature product - even if we need to pay to do > so - than to build another tool which will likely entropy over time - as > MemberDB has. > > > Feature set and applicability > > If LA were to adopt a mature tool, the feature set is likely to be much > richer - even if we don't use all of it. There will likely be use cases we > hadn't though of as the organisation evolves and our remit changes - and to > have a mature product established is likely to give us more flexibility. A > mature toolset is also likely to have wider applicability to the LUGs who > are Subcommittees of Linux Australia - and therefore entitled to leverage > LA's infrastructure. > > > Cost of ownership > > This argument is somewhat contentious. A mature product may have an > initial cost - for purchase, or installation consultancy -and for ongoing > maintenance and upgrades, depending if it's hosted on LA servers or hosted > somewhere in the cloud. However, the TCO of a non-mature product comes from > the loss of productivity in being able to do all the things we'd like to do > with a Membership system, and possibly the competing technologies it would > be written in. For instance, linux.org.au is on Drupal. The people > administering it - Web Team, Council etc - are going to be the same people > who use the tools and utilities. Let's make it easy for the people who > volunteer their time to Linux Australia to do what they need to do, rather > than having to switch between multiple systems. > > > Legal compliance > > Linux Australia is incorporated under the Incorporations Act of NSW, and > administered by the NSW Office of Fair Trading. There are a number of > requirements this legal framework places upon LA - which are generally very > reasonable. They include the ability to do good reporting on membership, > and ensure currency of membership. A mature product is both more likely to > allow us to achieve compliance, and further - and distinctly - demonstrate > that we are compliant. > > > I warmly welcome further discussion around this point. > > Kind regards, > Kathy > > > > > -- > -- > > Kathy Reid > kathy at kathyreid.id.au > 0418 130 636 > @kathyreid > > _______________________________________________ > linux-aus mailing list > linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kathy at kathyreid.id.au Sun Feb 1 16:02:11 2015 From: kathy at kathyreid.id.au (Kathy Reid) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 16:02:11 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] The case for an established product to replace MemberDB In-Reply-To: References: <54C07B69.1010607@kathyreid.id.au> Message-ID: <54CDB353.5000403@kathyreid.id.au> Hiya Tim, Great suggestion - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tyTA3Fj5J9XL2D7UTIxw46smXGrLM5J-fI4g6GxK9hM/edit?usp=sharing Bare bones at the moment, but as with all these things, it's a starting point. Best, Kathy On 1/02/2015 2:55 AM, Tim Ansell wrote: > In Josh's president report he mentions in the "Membership platform" > section; > > The Council, thanks to the hard work of Kathy Reid, has put > together a list of requirements of a membership platform and will > be looking for volunteers to help with shifting to a new system. > > > Could the "list of requirements" be shared with the list? (Or could I > have a link to them if they have been shared previous and I've missed > them.) > > Thanks! > > Tim > > > On 22 January 2015 at 15:24, Kathy Reid > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > There's been some excellent debate here about the future of > MemberDB, and whether a mature product - possibly CiviCRM, but not > necessarily - should be favoured over a collection of lower level > utilities. > I'd like to make the case for an established product. > > Maintability and supportability > > While less mature tools and utilities may do the job - and do the > job well - and even do *exactly* the job we want them to do, they > fall down when it comes to maintenance and supportability. We have > a small team of people who work on ZooKeepr - which is an integral > part of running linux.conf.au - and both > getting new people up to speed and willing to commit unpaid time > to maintenance is difficult. We all have day jobs/lives/other > commitments. > > If we were to go down the road of a mature product, then the > support ecosystem would be one of the selection criteria. If > necessary, we could buy in the skills to maintain and support the > product, and *documentation* for the product is likely going to > also be more comprehensive, lowering the barrier to entry of those > who may wish to volunteer time to maintain it. > > > Alignment with values > > Linux Australia supports open communities and open technologies, > and contributes to the open source industry and ecosystem in > Australia and New Zealand. I feel that it's actually a closer > alignment to our values to support and adopt an existing mature > product - even if we need to pay to do so - than to build another > tool which will likely entropy over time - as MemberDB has. > > > Feature set and applicability > > If LA were to adopt a mature tool, the feature set is likely to be > much richer - even if we don't use all of it. There will likely be > use cases we hadn't though of as the organisation evolves and our > remit changes - and to have a mature product established is likely > to give us more flexibility. A mature toolset is also likely to > have wider applicability to the LUGs who are Subcommittees of > Linux Australia - and therefore entitled to leverage LA's > infrastructure. > > > Cost of ownership > > This argument is somewhat contentious. A mature product may have > an initial cost - for purchase, or installation consultancy -and > for ongoing maintenance and upgrades, depending if it's hosted on > LA servers or hosted somewhere in the cloud. However, the TCO of a > non-mature product comes from the loss of productivity in being > able to do all the things we'd like to do with a Membership > system, and possibly the competing technologies it would be > written in. For instance, linux.org.au is on > Drupal. The people administering it - Web Team, Council etc - are > going to be the same people who use the tools and utilities. Let's > make it easy for the people who volunteer their time to Linux > Australia to do what they need to do, rather than having to switch > between multiple systems. > > > Legal compliance > > Linux Australia is incorporated under the Incorporations Act of > NSW, and administered by the NSW Office of Fair Trading. There are > a number of requirements this legal framework places upon LA - > which are generally very reasonable. They include the ability to > do good reporting on membership, and ensure currency of > membership. A mature product is both more likely to allow us to > achieve compliance, and further - and distinctly - demonstrate > that we are compliant. > > > I warmly welcome further discussion around this point. > > Kind regards, > Kathy > > > > > -- > -- > > Kathy Reid > kathy at kathyreid.id.au > 0418 130 636 > @kathyreid > > _______________________________________________ > linux-aus mailing list > linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jayvdb at gmail.com Sun Feb 1 18:17:10 2015 From: jayvdb at gmail.com (John Mark Vandenberg) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:17:10 +0700 Subject: [Linux-aus] MemberDB is a great short term solution, but we need a broader rethink In-Reply-To: References: <54B86BDC.4090801@kathyreid.id.au> <1421377640.4028.11.camel@colmiga.org> <54BCCE5B.7090009@nitrotech.org> Message-ID: If a python rewrite is on the cards, please let me know. -- John Vandenberg From kathy at kathyreid.id.au Sun Feb 1 19:09:29 2015 From: kathy at kathyreid.id.au (Kathy Reid) Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 19:09:29 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] MemberDB is a great short term solution, but we need a broader rethink In-Reply-To: References: <54B86BDC.4090801@kathyreid.id.au> <87386vaa7g.fsf@flamingspork.com> Message-ID: <54CDDF39.1040708@kathyreid.id.au> Thanks Tim for the roundup. I think our first step here should be identifying, then consolidating and (with Council's input of course), prioritising and weighting the requirements. While the most prominent requirements are likely going to be around managing memberships for Linux Australia, if we think forward to where LA might be in five years, this will also give rise to requirements for things like event handling and possibly tracking things like policy submissions. Then, we should rate each contender against weighted requirements to see what the best candidates are. Does this sound like a good way forward? Kind regards, Kathy On 1/02/2015 2:38 AM, Tim Ansell wrote: > Just getting through backlog of emails and discovered that AJ had also > suggested two other alternatives to ZooKeepr in another thread (I'm > excluding the third non-FOSS option). > > For completeness, the list of FOSS conference management systems which > *might* be alternatives for ZooKeepr are; > > * http://eldarion.com/symposion/ - used by PyCon US, ApacheCon > * https://launchpad.net/summit - used by Canonical, Linaro, DebConf > * http://pentabarf.org/Main_Page - (formerly?) used by CCC, > FOSDEM, DebConf > > Before LCA should even consider changing, someone actually needs to do > the legwork to find out all of the following; > * if the systems have the features needed by LCA (or other LA > conferences) and how much effort would be needed to add the missing > features, > * if the projects are under active development (and how does that > development compare to ZooKeepr), > * if the projects are in any better state than Zookeepr > * are there any experts we can lean on when we need XXX changes 5 > minutes before LCA starts, > > I'm **not** volunteering to do that. > > Tim 'mithro' Ansell > > On 1 February 2015 at 02:11, Tim Ansell > wrote: > > As Stewart mentioned, rewriting from scratch takes a lot of extra > effort and I don't think LA has the resources for that type of > task. There is a lot more to a conference management system then > it first seems like. Plus anything which deals with billing gets > complicated fast (writing a billing system seems to be a right of > passage for become a real "grumpy old programmer" :). > > If people really do want to replace ZooKeepr (which I'm not sure > is *actually* the case) its worth checking out Symposion used by > PyCon US and other conferences (http://eldarion.com/symposion/) > and contributing to that. The big problem with Symposion is that > it has been highly North America focused and hence probably > missing things needed by an Australian conference. > > Tim 'mithro' Ansell > > > On 28 January 2015 at 13:52, Stewart Smith > > wrote: > > Michael Cordover > writes: > > On 16 January 2015 at 14:39, Kathy Reid > > wrote: > >> While this is a great short term solution, I think we > should (in parallel) > >> discuss and debate a MemberDB replacement, likely something > like CiviCRM. > >> This is a bit more work and effort, but I think would have > good long term > >> returns, and address the pressing need for targeted member > communications. > > > > On this, I think it would be useful to do some project > scoping - not > > just around membership, but around all of the web-based > systems we are > > thining of upgrading. I know there's also been talk of a > zookeepr > > upgrade/rewrite. There are also probably other needs we > should be > > considering: other LA events, potential lobbying/other LA > activities, > > grants, Mailman 3 integration, Hurd compatibility etc etc etc. > > > > The first step here would be wishlisting *everything*, and then > > scoping it down into actual projects, then commencing work. > Strategic > > planning, yo. > > The important thing to keep in mind is that this is all volunteer > work. Zookeepr has been by volunteers from 2007 to get to > where it is > today. > > It would be a big judgement call to do a rewrite rather than > incremental > change - a lot of effort goes into getting all the basics again, > something that occured about 3 times before we used Zookeepr > for the > second time. > > -- > Stewart Smith > > _______________________________________________ > linux-aus mailing list > linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mikal at stillhq.com Mon Feb 2 10:48:25 2015 From: mikal at stillhq.com (Michael Still) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:48:25 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] Proposing a membership subcommittee In-Reply-To: <87y4on8vgj.fsf@flamingspork.com> References: <87y4on8vgj.fsf@flamingspork.com> Message-ID: Ok, so hi. I just came back to a business trip to discover I am drowing in memberdb threads. That's exciting, because its way better than no one caring enough to even reply to email. Give me a couple of days to digest the various emails, and then let's try for a quick IRC meeting of interested parties to come up with a plan. Michael On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Stewart Smith wrote: > Neill Cox writes: >> I am definitely interested in modernising memberdb. >> >> At this point I have a proof of concept that: >> >> - Uses the current database schema >> - Exposes a REST API via a flask/sqlalchemy >> - Provides a UI built on AngularJS and bootstrap >> >> It's very early but looks like it should work. >> >> There's lots still to do though and I'm keen to talk to anyone else >> interested in being involved. >> >> I'd also like to thank Stewart Smith for all of his work on the current >> memberdb, it's nice to have a sane design to start from! > > This all sounds awesome, and exactly the direction that things should go > in. The MemberDB code is not-exactly-best-practice of a dozen years ago, > so there's an awful lot that can be improved. Considering the tricky bit > is actually just the voting, it's quite likely that redoing the rest of > it in a modern framework would be excellent and not too hard. > > Probably a bunch better than all the manual PHP from way back when. > > -- > Stewart Smith -- Rackspace Australia From josh at nitrotech.org Mon Feb 2 17:46:24 2015 From: josh at nitrotech.org (Joshua Hesketh) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:46:24 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] MemberDB is a great short term solution, but we need a broader rethink In-Reply-To: References: <54B86BDC.4090801@kathyreid.id.au> <1421377640.4028.11.camel@colmiga.org> <54BCCE5B.7090009@nitrotech.org> Message-ID: <54CF1D40.6030304@nitrotech.org> A python re-write for memberdb is indeed on the cards. Neill, who has volunteered to help, has started working on a proof of concept. However, as highlighted in these discussions there may be reason to use an existing solution which may or may not be python. I'm sure the volunteers who have offered to help here will be taking all these into account. Any reason you ask? Are you able to help out? Cheers, Josh On 01/02/15 18:17, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: > If a python rewrite is on the cards, please let me know. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From donna at cc.com.au Mon Feb 9 16:40:40 2015 From: donna at cc.com.au (Donna Benjamin) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:40:40 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] DrupalSouth - not long now - 5-7 March in Melbourne Message-ID: <1423460440.8328.11.camel@gin.mel.cc.com.au> Hi all, Less than a month to go until DrupalSouth now. As it is a Linux Australia event, I invite you all to check out our program and come along, or perhaps forward to colleagues you know who'd be interested. https://melbourne2015.drupal.org.au/program/schedule We've got a couple of fantastic keynote speakers, 2 full days of sessions and a hands on Sprint Saturday to sit down and hack. Tix are on sale on the website. https://melbourne2015.drupal.org.au/conference/tickets -- Donna Benjamin Drupal South Melbourne 2015 5-7 March 2015 - Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre http://melbourne2015.drupal.org.au From secretary at linux.org.au Mon Feb 9 20:03:18 2015 From: secretary at linux.org.au (Linux Australia Secretary) Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:03:18 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] Minutes of Council Meeting 7th January 2015 Message-ID: <54D877D6.5040301@linux.org.au> Good Evening everyone, Please find below the minutes for the Linux Australia Council Meeting held on the 7th of January prior to the AGM. As always feedback and comments are warmly welcomed. Kind Regards Sae Ra ------- 1. Meeting overview and key information Present Ms. Kathy Reid, Mr. Francois Marier, Mr. Joshua Hesketh, Ms. Sae Ra Germaine (Minutes), Mr. Christopher Neugebauer Apologies Mr. Hugh Blemmings, Mr. Josh Stewart Meeting opened by Joshua Hesketh at 1949hrs and quorum was achieved Key Stats Stats not recorded this fortnight MOTIONthat the previous minutes of 17 December are correct Moved by Joshua Hesketh Seconded by Kathy Reid Carried unanimously 2. Log of correspondence Motions moved on list Nil motions moved on list this fortnight General correspondence * Council elections and nominations update Voting is in progress - to discuss any comms needed to encourage voting * Conflicts of interest in election nominations Discussions for the 2015 council to decide in regards to policy. MOTIONby KATHY REID that LA Council 2015 may wish to consider implementing a policy for declarations of conflict. SECONDEDby JOSHUA HESKETH CARRIEDunanimously * Annual General Meeting (AGM) update ACTION: Kathy to do draft AGM with office bearer reports to come in due course In Progress ACTION: Kathy to note Josh Stewart and Sae Ra Germaine as apologies * Office bearer reports and financial audit Treasurer and President reports are in progress Audit is in progress with the accountants UPDATE: Joshua?s Presidents? report has been completed and sent out to the list. ACTION: Francois to complete Treasurer?s report and Audit ACTION:Audit to be signed after the AGM and sent to accountants. * Request to house LinuxSA hosting on Linux Australia servers from DAVID LLOYD ACTION: Kathy to make contact with David to acknowledge request ACTION: Joshua to shoulder tap the admin team and see what?s possible ACTION: Joshua to communicate with DAVID LLOYD and discuss outcome UPDATE: All communication has been completed, Admin team will do what they can then follow up once hardware is upgraded. 3. Review of action items from previous meetings * ACTION: Joshua to communicate with GEMMA ROSE DUBLAN regarding grant request Completed * Discussions with Rusty Wrench team around announcing nominations In progress ACTION: Need to ensure that Wrench will be in Auckland for awarding Joshua will take the action Completed * ACTION: Joshua Hesketh to seek closure reports on closed events, being DrupalGov, JoomlaDay Sydney, WordCampSydney UPDATE: WordCampSydney are still to order Speakers? Gifts. * ACTION in progress with Admin team for 3 year spending plan for hardware replacement * ACTION with Josh Hesketh to ensure 3 year server support package in progress Actions are in progress with Admin Team UPDATE: Generally in progress. * Discussion of YouTube assets raised by KATHY REID based on discussions with TIM ANSELL ACTION: Josh Stewart to work through with Tim Ansell in due course In progress, Josh has been working with LCA2015 team on this too. Awaiting access to servers to continue, but generally in progress UPDATE: Access to YouTube accounts sorted, and metadata for missing 4 LCA years has been found (2010, 2011, 2013, 2009), test uploads have been successful. Huge thanks are extended to LEON WRIGHT for his enormous efforts here. UPDATE: 2009 and 2010 have been uploaded, and now scrapers are being written for 2007 and 2008. UPDATE: In Progress * ACTION: brand/logo policy needs to go on backburner UPDATE: President?s report touches on this. * ACTION: We need to set up a VM to enable continuous delivery for conferences. ACTION: Joshua to discuss with LCA2016 process for managing ZooKeepr UPDATE: In progress with admin team. LCA2016 are aware. UPDATE: We want to be smarter about how we do continuous integration with ZooKeepr, there is some discussion and work to be done here between Geelong LCA2016 team, Admin Team and Joshua. Dependent on Geelong deployment timeframes. Update: Discussion completed. * ACTION: Kathy to use @linuxaustralia account to retweet @linuxconfau announcements UPDATE: In progress 4. Items for discussion 1. LCA2015 update Sales are progressing well. 5 Days to go! 2. LCA2016 update Presentation has been completed. 3. LCA2017 update Announcement to be made at LCA2015 ACTION: Joshua to announce on the closing ceremony of LCA2015 4. PyCon AU update Site visits have been completed and to be announced. 5. Drupal South ACTION: Joshua to touch base with DONNA BENJAMIN 6. Drupal Gov Wrapped up 7. DrupalCampSydney Wrapped up 8. WordCampSydney Some financials to wrap up, Speakers? Gifts in progress ACTION: To be picked up after LCA2015 5. Items for noting Nil items for noting. 6. Other business * Transfer of $AUD to $NZD given the falling $AUD For discussion of implications and a decision Noted. No further action required. Cashflow is adequate. * Do we still need a Risk Register? Should we put some focus on it? ACTION: Kathy to update Risk Register and bring back to Council for review No update since last meeting Noted: For new 2015 council to consider. * Financial year closed IN PROGRESS: Francois to work with Auditor to sign off 2013/2014 accounts TO NOTE: Office Bearers to start thinking about Office Bearer reports for the AGM * Communication from Maggie from Wuhan Deepin Technology Co., Ltd. regarding hosting of the Deepin Distribution. To be considered by the Admin/Mirror Team ACTION: Kathy to respond and advise that this has been forwarded to the Admin team and will be considered after our busy period (linux.conf.au) has been completed. 7. In camera Nil items were discussed in camera Meeting Closed at 2011hrs -- Sae Ra Germaine Secretary Linux Australia secretary at linux.org.au http://linux.org.au Linux Australia Inc GPO Box 4788 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia ABN 56 987 117 479 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.nielsen at shikadi.net Tue Feb 17 20:54:34 2015 From: a.nielsen at shikadi.net (Adam Nielsen) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:54:34 +1000 Subject: [Linux-aus] SBS on Demand under Linux Message-ID: <20150217195434.19c4a96d@korath.teln.shikadi.net> Hi all, Has anyone figured out how to get SBS on Demand working under Linux, without needing to install Flash? With all the security issues it has I really don't want to install it, and it doesn't look like they support HTML5, so it seems as if there's no way to use it under Linux. Has anyone found a way to do this? Thanks, Adam. From bob.hepple at gmail.com Tue Feb 17 21:10:54 2015 From: bob.hepple at gmail.com (Bob Hepple) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:10:54 +1000 Subject: [Linux-aus] SBS on Demand under Linux In-Reply-To: <20150217195434.19c4a96d@korath.teln.shikadi.net> References: <20150217195434.19c4a96d@korath.teln.shikadi.net> Message-ID: I had it working briefly with chrome which includes a version of flash IIRC. It stopped working last time I looked but maybe I just need an upgrade. That was Centos-6 Cheers On 17 February 2015 at 19:54, Adam Nielsen wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone figured out how to get SBS on Demand working under Linux, > without needing to install Flash? With all the security issues it has > I really don't want to install it, and it doesn't look like they > support HTML5, so it seems as if there's no way to use it under Linux. > > Has anyone found a way to do this? > > Thanks, > Adam. > _______________________________________________ > linux-aus mailing list > linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au > http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus From bpa at iss.net.au Tue Feb 17 21:16:30 2015 From: bpa at iss.net.au (Brenda Aynsley) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:46:30 +1030 Subject: [Linux-aus] SBS on Demand under Linux In-Reply-To: <20150217195434.19c4a96d@korath.teln.shikadi.net> References: <20150217195434.19c4a96d@korath.teln.shikadi.net> Message-ID: <54E314FE.4020203@iss.net.au> On 17/02/15 20:24, Adam Nielsen wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone figured out how to get SBS on Demand working under Linux, > without needing to install Flash? With all the security issues it has > I really don't want to install it, and it doesn't look like they > support HTML5, so it seems as if there's no way to use it under Linux. > > Has anyone found a way to do this? it appears to work without anything to be done except open it in chromium http://www.sbs.com.au/ondemand/video/392104003638/Mad-Men-The-Other-Woman at least in ubuntu 14.04 cheers brenda -- Brenda Aynsley OAM, FACS CP, ACS Honorary Life Member ACS President 2014 & 2015 Chair IFIP International Professional Practice Partnership (IP3) 2011-15 ACS Partnering for Success Mobile:+61(0)412 662 988 || Phone:+61(0)8 7127 0107 Skype/Yahoo/Twitter: baynsley Mobile when I am out of Australia: +372 5408 0036 From ben at stumbles.id.au Tue Feb 17 21:41:25 2015 From: ben at stumbles.id.au (Ben Sturmfels) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:41:25 +1100 Subject: [Linux-aus] SBS on Demand under Linux In-Reply-To: <20150217195434.19c4a96d@korath.teln.shikadi.net> References: <20150217195434.19c4a96d@korath.teln.shikadi.net> Message-ID: <54E31AD5.7010809@stumbles.id.au> On 17/02/15 20:54, Adam Nielsen wrote: > Has anyone figured out how to get SBS on Demand working under Linux, > without needing to install Flash? With all the security issues it has > I really don't want to install it, and it doesn't look like they > support HTML5, so it seems as if there's no way to use it under Linux. Hi Adam, I had no luck with Gnash or Lightspark, but was able to play movies directly with VLC with a bit of messing around. Open up the HTML source for the video you're interested in and search for "releaseUrls". Just below this you'll see a parameter 'html': '[URL]'. [URL] refers to an SMIL file, which is the meta-data that a video player can use to play the file - where to download the various versions, subtitles etc. In theory you should just be able open that file in Totem or similar. For me, Totem didn't support the video codec though, so I got only audio. That might vary between movies. VLC didn't want to open the SMIL file directly, but worked fine if I opened the SMIL file in a text editor and copied the [URL] from