[Linux-aus] What is LA's response to UEFI Secure Boot?

[Matthew Lye]

Wasn't this done a year ago?

-Matthew Lye

 Leadership is responsibility, not privilege, Action, not position,
Guidance, not knowledge, and outcome, not disposition.
<No trees were harmed during this transmission. However, a great number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced>


On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Brent Wallis <brent.wallis at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi to All,
>
> What is our collective response to UEFI and secure boot?
>
> Canonical and RH have taken a position.
> The FSF seem to have taken an opposing view.
>
> Is it true?
> Could we be facing a situation where we could be locked out of a Linux
> install on current and future PC/ Laptop hardware?
>
> What impact will this have on servers systems?
> Rgds
> BW
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/listinfo/linux-aus
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20120805/c72bef57/attachment.htm