[Linux-aus] AUUG to close? Will there be a rush of new members to Linux Australia?
sjh at svana.org
Fri Dec 21 06:46:25 UTC 2007
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 12:01:22PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Dave Davey">
> > Let things evolve with LA's brand untarnished (except perhaps for some
> > small print acknowledgement "incorporating AUUG") and see what happens.
> > If there are many new members and they make an impact a new name may
> > evolve. The name is not the starting point.
> I think one of the problems with this discussion is that two independent
> topics have been conflated. There's the whole issue of what to do about
> AUUG, which is fundamentally up to the AUUG membership. Then there's the
> issue about the Linux Australia name, which is an independent issue even
> though some naming issues have been raised in the context of the AUUG
Cool something I agree with Jeff on :)
Yes people need to realise the LA name change suggestion is completely
unrelated to AUUG.
As much as I respect Jeff and all the cool stuff he does, this is
definitely one area I disagree with him on (LA name change). However open
debate is always interesting and useful.
The LA name change idea (and lca name change) has been brought up a few
times in the last year and a half. It is something we obviously need to hash
out more and get high community involvement with getting our future
direction worked out on.
Maddog made a great post to this list last year when we were discussing the
issue (though part of why I think it so good is possibly due to him agreeing
with my dissinterest in renaming lca)
Anyway keep the issues seperate but keep the debate coming.
Steven Hanley sjh at svana.org http://svana.org/sjh/diary
we're all citizens of the womb, before we subdivide
into sexes and shades, this side, that side
Work Your Way Out - Ani Difranco - Ani
More information about the linux-aus