[Linux-aus] Utter tripe in CIO magazine

[Nathan Bailey]

I'm sorry Ashley, you're right -- they are valid concerns, but they are 
very old, well-worn ones IMHO (the kind of issues we heard back before 
Linux had proven itself).  Linux has addressed many of the issues he's 
raised and overcome many of the barriers he suggests.

So rather than tripe I should've said dusty arguments ;-)

re,
N

On 07/04/2006, at 9:19 AM, ashley maher wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 21:44 +1000, Nathan Bailey wrote:
>> Jonathan,
>> 	I think it would be good if you, as president of Linux Australia,
>> responded to this article in CIO -- influential decisions makers read
>> this magazine and might be affected by the poor arguments put forward
>> here:
>>
>> Albatrosses Yes, Penguins No
>> Peter Hind, CIO
>> http://www.cio.com.au/index.php/id;1404610049
>
> Nathan,
>
> Actually I agree with a carefully worded response, however, the
> arguments put forward are hardly poor.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ashley
>