On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 21:29 +1100, Michael Still wrote: > Jonathan Oxer wrote: > > Hi there party people, > I would think that each of the items needs more descriptive text, and > perhaps and ongoing commentary on it's status. The former is so that > people know what you're talking about, and couple just be a cut and > paste from the committee minutes. The later lets people know that at an > attempt at progress is being made, even if no progress is being made. Yeap - hopefully info will flesh out nicely as we start to use it for things. -- Stewart Smith (stewart@linux.org.au) Committee Member, Linux Australia
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part