[Linux-aus] Suggestion for the 'lugs' list

[Brad Hards]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 29 May 2003 16:16 pm, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>   - Representation and feedback from the LUGs to the LA ctte, to make sure
>     that LA continues to represent the entire country.
This is a problem for C(anberra)LUG, which has no formal representatives.

Is a lug- list really needed? I see LUGs as really important, but don't see 
where the distinction between the linux-aus list and a lug- list should be 
drawn.

Brad
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+1dFCW6pHgIdAuOMRAgGtAJ9dGuaSrzlSVVcvEBg6PE88oTH4BQCgo9Kt
K41kHsSWr6YEf6P4MpELn8o=
=0QdI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----