[Linux-aus] Extent of sco's complaint - birthday paradox

[Greg 'groggy' Lehey]

On Saturday,  7 June 2003 at 11:35:40 +0930, David Lloyd wrote:
>
>> It still seems much more plausible to me that SCO engineers
>> incorporated Linux code into System V than the other way round.
>> Firstly the Linux code is easier to get hold of, and secondly the
>> likelihood that they'd be caught is much smaller.
>
> Maybe someone with more money than brains could sue SCO for breach
> of the GPL and seek to send ALL of SCO's code to be released under
> the GPL.

That was a hypothesis on my part.  It needs to be proven first.

Oh, wait, this is civil law, isn't it?  Yes, you could be right :-)

Greg
--
Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20030607/18a1c764/attachment-0001.pgp