On Sunday, 24 August 2003 at 21:38:53 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: > > http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/code-comparison.html > > Summary [but the details are what make it worth reading! :-] > > This presentation was supposed to prove that Linux is abusing > SCO intellectual property. It seems not only to completely > and utterly fail in this purpose, but also to show a number > of problems within SCO: > > * Neither example shows any current infringement of SCO > intellectual property in the Linux kernel. > > * The first example appears to indicate that SCO, far from > being an industry leader in UNIX technology, still uses > the original, primitive version of malloc(), a central > kernel function, a version which everybody else gave up > years ago. > > * The second example says nothing about Linux, since it's > obviously not SCO code. It does, however, suggest that > SCO is abusing the BSD license. > > * Presumably SCO thinks these are some of the best examples. > If this is the best they have to offer, they don't have a > leg to stand on. > > Round of applause, that man! (-: Thanks. I'm really surprised that nobody else has picked up this copyright infringement thing yet. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers
Attachment:
pgp00019.pgp
Description: PGP signature