[Linux-aus] Legal Eagle question
David Lloyd
dlloyd at microbits.com.au
Mon Aug 11 15:00:02 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
> Instead of making grand claims, IBM have left it up to the Court to
> decide. If the Court picks a value as small as half a billion dollars,
> that's over USD$300,000,000.00 more than The SCO Group has. "Your
> honour, I would like to recover my legal expenses from this small but
> very deep and still-smoking crater."
Couldn't the courts also award legal costs to IBM if it is proven that the
court case was, what's the right word:
* pernicious?
* not made seriously?
* [I can't think of the word]
..i.e. such a stupid case that it shouldn't have been bought up by a
reasonable lawyer?
DSL
- --
Ce soir je vais coucher avec un chouchou!
Oh la la!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Nz63NBhAwwyvg/kRAlJmAJ0djA/SU1rZ6INNwg0KnZ2LwSPabQCcD/Mj
jtswzNdueRA7oyn4e7MwHXc=
=s5lK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the linux-aus
mailing list