[Computerbank] coming to terms with the Catch 22 puzzle/conundrum
kylied at projectx.com.au
Mon Nov 5 14:58:04 UTC 2001
Just a few more considerations to throw into the melting pot. :)
> ~ a lot of donations turn out to be useless
> ~ not enough people to field the telephone/fax/email contacts
> ~ not enough volunteers to pick up the donations
Hmmm - and now - NOT enough MONEY to reimburse volunteers for picking up
equipment. How do you want to solve that one for me?
> ~ go with the flow, pick it all up, but comment on the radio show
To pick up junk is a waste of time and space. No thanks. And if I\'m reimbursing
volunteers for pickups - it\'s also a waste of money.
> ~ throughput is too slow
Throughput of computers is okay - it\'s throughput of training that isnt okay.
We only have two (three) volunteer trainers who are doing *all* the training.
Theres Penni, myself and Grant. Quite frankly we can not cope with doing any
more sessions, so dont even think about more throughput of systems without more
*RELIABLE* people who will turn up every saturday/thursday to train 8 people.
Then there\'s the other problem of trainees (recipients) cancelling sessions
(sometimes not even showing up) and rescheduling (thus taking a spot that could
have been given to a newbie trainee). How are you going to counteract that one?
I counteract it by making a \"DO NOT CALL\" file. Therefore if person x doesnt
show to training sessions and doesnt call us to explain why, they automagically
go into a folder - that says \"do not call\" - \"wait for them to call us\".
Theres about 8 folk in that folder atm. :)
> ~ there aren\'t enough volunteers to deliver and install the computers
Until further notice, no volunteer at CB - will be giving any recipient and
their computer a lift home. There are dire insurance implications here - and
until we get this clarified - this STOPS PRONTO.
More information about the computerbank