[Linux-aus] Ceph FS vs Gluster FS

[Steven Ellis]

The bigger question is how much storage do you need and do you need a
distributed scale out storage environment like Ceph or Gluster. Both of
these typically require 3+ physical servers in order to operate correctly.

If you're going to use Ceph with Containers look at Rook as a wrapper.
VMs - it depends on your hypervisor tooling and any live migration
requirements.
File wise CephFS is pretty stable these days and has better consistency
than using NFS/CIFs.

Steven


On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 6:56 AM Anestis Kozakis via linux-aus <
linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au> wrote:

> I was wondering fi people could summarize  me the difference as well s the
> pros and cons fo GlusterFS vs CephFS inr regards to the following uses:
>
> File Server/System and creating Virtual Machines and Containers.
>
> I will, of course, do my own research, but I am looking to get other
> people's experiences and opinions.
>
> Anestis.
> --
> Anestis Kozakis | kenosti at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-aus mailing list
> linux-aus at lists.linux.org.au
> http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to
> linux-aus-unsubscribe at lists.linux.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20230606/2f6ab18d/attachment-0001.html>