[Linux-aus] Who defines Open Source?
michael at msdavies.net
Wed Feb 8 12:19:02 UTC 2006
> -------Original Message-------
> From: Del <del at babel.com.au>
> Subject: Re: [Linux-aus] Who defines Open Source?
> Sent: 08 Feb '06 12:43
> Sometimes I release code as "no license, public domain", which
> is also useful in itself, however it doesn't pass the FSF tests and I'm not
> sure if it even counts as open source or not.
Code without a licence falls under simple copyright I believe, which doesn't make is useful for anyone else to use. So if you really don't care what happens to your code, why not release it under a BSD-non-attribution licence so people can actually safely use your code without any further thought?
Michael Davies "Do what you think is interesting, do
michael at msdavies.net something that you think is fun and
michaeldavies.org worthwhile, because otherwise you won't
do it well anyway." -- Brian Kernighan
More information about the linux-aus