[Linux-aus] Extent of sco's complaint.
Jon maddog Hall
maddog at li.org
Sat Jun 7 12:09:01 UTC 2003
>Copyrighted code is copyrighted code.
>AT&T didn't allow use of those files; they still required them to be fixed
Absolutely again, and I did not mean to imply that they did not.
However, there is a difference between having the disputed code in "only"
three (or even six) files, and having it distributed throughout the system
in hundreds of files....that is the point I was trying to make.
> Heh. A couple of days ago Warren Toomey discovered that the original
> System V sources have more UCB copyright notices than AT&T and Bell
> Labs copyright notices :-)
Not surprising at all.
Jon "maddog" Hall
Executive Director Linux(R) International
email: maddog at li.org 80 Amherst St.
Voice: +1.603.672.4557 Amherst, N.H. 03031-3032 U.S.A.
Board Member: Uniforum Association, USENIX Association
(R)Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in several countries.
More information about the linux-aus